Archive for the ‘International’ Category

Re-defining e-commerce sales

What defines an e-commerce sale? This may seem like a question with an easy answer, “sales made online”, right? Not necessarily. A recent article in the Harvard Business Review by Darrell Rigby titled “The Future of Shopping” points out that the influence of e-commerce on sales is not simply about the daily report you receive about yesterday’s on-site sales.

The article asks “is it an e-commerce sale if the customer goes to a store, finds that the product is out of stock, and uses an in-store terminal to have another location ship it to her home? What if the customer is shopping in one store, uses his smartphone to find a lower price at another, and then orders electronically for in-store pickup? How about gifts that are ordered from a website but exchanged at a local store? Experts estimate that digital information already influences about 50% of in-store sales and that number is growing rapidly”.

These scenarios and many others highlight the blurring lines between e-commerce and traditional bricks and mortar shopping, yet this is a topic that many traditional retailers have not begun to understand.

This blurring of the lines creates a host of issues for traditional retailers. How do you market to consumers in the digital age? How do retailers properly track what sources are driving revenue? In terms of marketing to digital age consumers it is apparent that the days of viewing digital channels, in-store marking and traditional advertising in isolation are coming to an end. A focus on creating the easiest and most rewarding shopping experience for the consumer will need to take precedence across retail marketing, creative and advertising agency offices with a focus on coordination of messages.

Marketing efforts will specifically need to increase for mobile and tablet devices as consumers are becoming increasingly savvy at utilising the power of these devices as tools help them shop for the best deals.

The article points out one particularly interesting example of this, citing Tesco’s brand in South Korea called Home plus. In an effort to “bring the store to the consumers at a point in the day when they had time on their hands… Home plus covered the walls of Seoul subway stations with remarkably lifelike backlit images of supermarket shelves containing orange juice fresh vegetables and meat, and hundreds of other items. Consumers wanting to do their food shopping could simply scan each product’s Quick Response code into their smartphones, touch an on-screen button, and thereby assemble a virtual shopping cart. Home plus then delivered the physical goods to the shopper’s home within a few hours”.

In addition to changes in the way retailers market themselves, another aspect of the traditional retail approach must also be addressed. How will various stores, the retailers’ website and marketing channels be credited for sales?  Most retailers still approach sales reporting on a per store basis with the website being counted as one store. As the example above clearly shows this approach is not necessarily relevant in the digital world.

If one store, for example, has a great sales staff but limited stock, it is very possible that consumers could be purchasing online as result of their experience in store. Who gets credit for this? Shouldn’t the great sales staff get some credit? Retailers that think of how to model a reporting system that gives credit where credit is due will likely be ahead of the game in relation to their competitors. They will be in a better position to encourage sales staff to meet all of the consumers’ needs rather than only the needs that can be met within the confines of the walls of the store.

As we can see the definition of an e-commerce sale is changing at a rapid pace and will continue to do so over the coming months and years. Retailers that look ahead and begin to address these changes no are likely to be at big advantage in the years to come.

Blog post by Mike Jennings Director at Reform

Strictly come surfing – at the half way mark

Last year, after an off the cuff comment in a meeting with our PR agency I set about digging around online data sources to see if they could be used to see who would win Strictly Come Dancing. Looking at search and social data in the build up to the show launching last autumn, there was a clear front runner – Kara Tointon. It also happened that she was an excellent dancer, and so as the weeks went on it was very easy to keep chopping the data in a different way and confirm that Kara would win.

This year the stakes have been raised as the challenge of examining the data to see who would go out each week was laid at our door. Manfully we accepted the challenge and have been writing a weekly post for the Guardian’s Media Monkey blog outlining what the data says and what that means for who is going to leave Strictly in any given week.

We found out very early on that predicting the loser each week is much more difficult than predicting the winner of the whole show. Who’d have thought it, hey?! The first issue we encountered was that of collecting clean data for the celebrities. Is there a more generic name out there than Alex Jones? Perhaps John Smith, but after that I’m not so sure! It has taken us until this, the half way point to be entirely happy that the data we’re looking at is actually about the right people as we’ve tweaked our queries each week.

Another issue that we have faced has been in examining the sentiment behind the buzz of celebrities. Our experience told us that volume itself was no sign of popularity, as people love to get on social networks to have a good whinge as much as they use it to declare themselves a fan – if not more! Our in house self-expressed data fiend developed a tool for sentiment analysis (well done Richard!) that does a pretty good job of sorting the positive from the negative, but there is no tool out there that is 100% accurate. In fact, even paid for tools such as Brandwatch and Meltwater aim for 70% accuracy – so we’re always at risk of being wrong. Just as an example one week someone tweeted ‘@bbcstrictly bloody hell that was absolutely fab…u…lous!! Len you are wrong #scd’ – our tool put this firmly in the negative camp, but clearly it’s not!

All that is before anybody has even danced a dance. We found that the volatility in the dancing performance by the celebrities in the bottom half of the table in the first few weeks made it very difficult to judge what would happen. As the couple that leaves is decided by a combination of the judges score for their dance and the phone vote, a novice celebrity doing the pasodoble one week and a waltz the next might be near the middle one week and then rock bottom of the judges score the next. We quickly had to factor this fluctuation into our algorithm, allocating a score for the perceived difficulty of the dance celebrities were undertaking each week.

So how have we done? We’re currently sitting at about a 50% success rate in predicting who will go out each week – so using the data is certainly more effective than randomly guessing! More than anything I think our experience doing this analysis has shown that data on its own isn’t enough. Without understanding the context and the content of the data we would have been way off the mark every week. By examining the source and taking into account the limitations of our data, we can be much more calculated in the way in which we read it. Data is one thing, but insight is another!

Blog post by Penny Anderson, Consultant at Reform

The untapped potential of online video

Recently I had the privilege of jumping across the pond to attend the online media, marketing and advertising expo, OMMA. Not only was it two inspiring days of serious talks and discussions with all the most up-to-date news, information and ideas in the world of online marketing but plenty speculation on the future of digital.

My focus for the two days was to understand more about online video. The statistics, courtesy of comScore tell an interesting story:

In the US alone there are 108 million people watching online video with 1.3 billion videos been watched daily. Video has seen a 1,290% growth since January 2006. An amazing stat, and yet this fast growing internet segment is increasingly under-monetized. In 2010 the US spent $1,440 million on advertising and had 441 billion videos viewed as opposed to a $324 million ad spend and 63 billion videos viewed in 2006. So a 334% increase in spend but an astonishing 600% increase in videos watched. In August 2011 there were 185 million online videos viewed, 162 million of those were on YouTube alone. That is an average of 228 videos per person per month. For the average person that is, 17 hours a month.

When looking for examples of countries getting video right one needs to look at Canada, the US and China. China and the US both manage to get over 150 million unique views per month. Canada and the US both have over 180 videos viewed a month per viewer with the majority of the videos viewed are homemade and funny. However we can learn something from that. People like to be entertained and want funny content.

The heaviest consumers of online video are 18-34 year olds, with 49.7% being female users and 50.3% male. Men watch 1.7 times as many videos online as women, a ratio that has remained constant for the past two years.

Between 2009 – 2010, the growth among long-term TV programming sites of videos viewed increased 104%. So why then are advertisers not jumping in and making the most out of online video? Is it because we are still wary of the unfamiliar content, unsure of the true effectiveness, trying to put video into the TV model of storytelling?

I’m particularly excited to see the next stages of online video and how brands rise to the challenge to harness its potential. It’s already a big opportunity and growing by the day.

Blog post by Anthony Dobson, Business Development Executive at Reform

Yandex – Yet ANother inDEX?

There are parts of the world where Google is not dominant. In Russia the search engine Yandex is the market leader with a market share of over 60%. Helped by rapidly growing internet usage in Russia, the search engine doubled the number of searches it handles between 2008 and 2009. For online businesses operating in Russia there is no question about the importance of Yandex (for more about search engine marketing in Russia read our Internation Search Review post) but since the launch of an English language search engine in 2010 should the rest of the world be thinking about Yandex?

There are two aspects to this question:
1. Will Yandex gain a large worldwide market share?

2. Are there other reasons to observe what Yandex is doing?

Will Yandex gain a large worldwide market share?
In my opinion, no. Right now people have no reason to use Yandex. It is not integrated with any of the online services commonly used in the West, nor is it the default search engine on any of the main browsers. The only ways Yandex can increase market share are either by spending a lot of money on advertising (this is working, but very slowly, for Bing) or by being better at search than Google. Unfortunately for Yandex, they can’t just be a little bit better they need to be a lot better; studies (by Microsoft) show that people say the quality of results from Bing are equal to those of Google, but only when the Bing results are wrapped in Google branding. Any new search engine that wants to dominate the market needs to be an order of magnitude better, just as Google was in 1998.

The search technology behind Yandex
Google beat the competition with their PageRank algorithm. Page and Brin realised that strong webpages were more likely to be linked to from other strong webpages. In other words, they picked a feature that they thought good webpages should have and then built their search engine to rank pages with this feature.

Yandex’s MatrixNet algorithm is very different; given a list of good pages for a queryspace, MatrixNet uses machine learning to decide which features distinguish them from the average. Then they rank pages with similar features in that queryspace. This method is a great defence against spammers because any feature that becomes common is no longer a powerful ranking signal. For example, if everyone has an optimised title tag then having an optimised title tag is not a signal of quality.

The main weakness with the MatrixNet approach is getting the list of good pages to begin with. The internet is too large for this to be manually curated so there has to be another algorithm to generate the list of quality sites. This algorithm must be very conservative in the sites it selects, otherwise results quality will suffer a lot; imagine if having a large number of AdSense ads became a positive ranking factor!

Google’s recent Panda updates use a similar approach. Matt Cutts (Head of Web Spam at Google) has said that they “came up with a classifier to say, okay, IRS or Wikipedia or New York Times is over on this side, and the low-quality sites are over on this side”. However, this algorithm update can only reduce rankings, not increase them so Google do not need to be as conservative with how it is applied (some site owners say they should have been a lot more careful).

As evidenced by their Panda update (and many other projects), Google has the technical ability to do machine learning at web scale. Should Yandex’s approach begin producing SERPs of amazing quality then Google can copy their approach before Yandex’s market share reaches critical mass. This is why Yandex need an order of magnitude improvement over Google; they need to capture a large amount of market share before Google improve their algorithm to match.

Why you should pay attention to Yandex
Like Yandex, the browser Opera also has a large market share in Russia without being a big player in the West. Opera introduced features like tabbed browsing and “speed dial” that have since been imitated by Firefox, Chrome and others. Web designers watch how Opera are innovating because some new features will cross over into the mainstream.

Similarly, you should keep an eye on what Yandex are doing because they take a different approach to search and successful features from their algorithm are likely to appear in other places.

Blog post by Richard Fergie, Consultant at Reform

From riots to dinosaurs – how digital continues to amaze me

I am a student from Birmingham City University, working at Reform on my placement year. A couple of months into my digital year in industry there are few things that have struck me…

When I tell people I am working in digital for my placement year, a common reaction is to imagine a fantasy world, impregnable, with very techy people playing around with code on computers.  I don’t think that could be further from the truth at this moment in time. Digital is becoming more and more crucial to daily life and I for one welcome this.

Social media was recently blamed by many for enabling the London riots. However, I think the key point to remember is that it’s not social media itself that is the problem, its how people use it. For all the Blackberry messenger organised rioting, there were also some fantastic campaigns on Twitter and Facebook which help to restore faith in humanity, focusing on communities cleaning up and coming together.

This is the kind of reassurance that digital can provide, and it even extends to nations. During the earthquakes in Japan, Twitter, Facebook and Skype all helped families to reconnect and confirm the safety of loved ones. Analogue phone lines could not cope with the extreme high levels of people trying to contact each other, but digital platforms enabled contact and granted peace of mind in times of immense trauma.

And what about the power of social media to spread fantastic stories that would not be heard otherwise? The best example in the last few days is the story about one man’s experience with Marks and Spencer’s customer service. In case you haven’t already seen it, one customer who was overcharged for a sandwich was told in response to his complaint that he would receive a gift card in compensation. When he didn’t receive his gift card he asked politely for a hand-drawn picture of a smiley dinosaur to be included with the gift card (presumably as a joke?!). Wonderfully he actually got what he asked for, including a message apologising ‘unfortunately art was never my strong point…’ Check out the picture of the dinosaur – it’s actually quite good!

Digital is connecting more and more with the real world and we get to hear about real people and their experiences so much more than we ever could previously. What I love about the digital industry is that it’s volatile, it’s unpredictable, it’s challenging and it’s here to stay. Another plus is that apparently I’m a computer genius now that I work in digital. (It is worth bearing in mind that this is coming from my mother who is amazed because I know Ctrl+C…).

By Karen Hawey at Reform

The new domain name game

Starting in January 2012, companies will have the opportunity to register new tailored domain names. Traditional naming conventions such as .com and .net will continue to exist, but brands will be able to use other words or phrases, such as their own brand name, as their domain name. For example, Reform.com could use reform.reform and other variations thereof using the .reform structure.

What will the cost for this new domain structure be? There’s an application fee which costs around £180,000, plus an annual running cost around £25,000. So, for many businesses, this kind of investment will prove cost prohibitive.

At Reform we’ll be monitoring what effect, if any, these new naming conventions have on search optimisation best practices. Will Google and other search engines favour one domain name over the other, and if so, could it lead to an unfair advantage in preserving top rankings? This will be an interesting space that we’ll be keeping an eye on for our clients.

Additionally, the new domain naming convention .xxx has been approved by ICANN after eleven years. Although some countries, such as India, have already started banning the new naming convention, brands and individuals now have less than a fifty day window to register to ensure their assets are not used in the adult online industry.

While the benefits of the .xxx domain include heightened parental control, as well as the hope that people will be less likely to unwittingly stumble across adult content, the 15,000 domain names that have been reserved are almost certainly not enough to protect all the people that may be affected. What about everyone else’s reputations?

ICM Registry’s chief executive Stuart Lawley said, “Regardless of what your personal views are on the existence of pornography on the internet, at least .xxx will give people the information they need to make a choice.”

Reform provides a bespoke brand monitoring service that can help you to ensure your brand is not misrepresented. With these new developments, it is more important than ever to invest in the right amount of diligence to protect your brand. Get in touch if you would like to know more.

Blog post by Anthony Dobson, Business Development Executive at Reform

Search engine marketing in Malaysia – International search review issue number 7

Reform has this week published the latest paper in its international search review series. Continuing the focus on markets in Southeast Asia, this instalment looks at the internet and search market of Malaysia.

With internet penetration increasing from 15% in 2000 to 59% in 2009, it’s clear that there has been significant change in this country’s technological outlook over the last decade.

This is another market where Google has consolidated its dominance of the search engine arena, growing its share from 51% in 2008 to 85% in 2011.

The increase in internet penetration (16,902,600 internet users as of June 2009) has occurred in spite of the fact that the quality of the broadband in Malaysia is still rated as ‘poor’. This, combined with a growing number of increasingly sophisticated mobile devices, has led analysts to believe that mobile search will become ever more important in this market.

Advances in mobile technologies can also be looked to as the facilitators for the phenomenal popularity of social media sites in Malaysia. This is a country that has Facebook penetration of 88.4%, and which accounts for .47% of Twitter’s world voice.

Since 2009 the number of Malaysian web users using social media to keep in touch with family has increased to 71%.

To find out more about the search market landscape in Malaysia, download a copy of the review – and let us know any comments or feedback that you might have. You can also download past issues of the International Search Review to see what we discovered about Chinese internet development and the Russian search behaviour evolution amongst other things.

Contact us and we’ll send you the next issue of our International Search Review before anyone else.

Blog post by Juliette van Rooyen, Consultant at Reform.

Google updates: Panda/Farmer

Over recent weeks the internet has been alive with commentary on Google’s recent changes to its search algorithms, labelled by some as “farmer” and others as “panda”. The changes that were initiated in the USA are now permeating Google sites worldwide with changes now evident on google.co.uk. Some of these changes are perceived to be having a devastating effect on websites who are seeing traffic levels fall by up to 90%.

The SEO implications

For a bit of background, “farmer” and “panda” are the same thing, explained in detail here – http://searchengineland.com/google-forecloses-on-content-farms-with-farmer-algorithm-update-66071 and http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/03/the-panda-that-hates-farms/ (Summary: “content farms” were the initial target, hence the name “farmer” while “panda” was Google’s code name for the very same update).  However, in the UK, it is often referred to as the latter.

The principal impact of the changes appears to be a downgrading of many of the most used article repositories, such as Ezine articles and Suite101, which has in turn had a knock-on effect on businesses that interact with these sites as part of their SEO strategy. For years, the SEO mantra has been ‘content is king’, which lead many sites to add as much templated content as possible to their site (and towards their site), often overlooking the quality of the source. This artificial inflation of a site’s amount of content now leaves them vulnerable to plummeting rankings and the associated ramifications.

Our take on the Panda update (Reform UK)

With the advent of the Panda update, we’ve seen a considerable shift in the type of sites being affected. Even those sites with significant brand authority have seen a large drop in visibility, resulting in a drop in traffic. For information sites this is problematic, but for e-commerce sites, this can be catastrophic.

The primary targeting has been towards uniform content on sites, such as articles that have been syndicated on sites which have no other content. However, it’s not just the sites that syndicate, it’s also their primary sources of content, the articles sites which have taken significant hits. Even for those sites that do not syndicate content, sites that rely solely on strategies like this for link building and that use templates for elements like product pages seem to be suffering as well.

Well known sites like Play.com have lost around 10% of their visibility and the associated level of traffic. This is possibly a very low level indicator that the real world weight of brands could be having less of an impact on their search rankings. There have also been a large number of well-regarded tech sites seeing significantly decreased rankings, such as Techworld & Techradar.

Our take on the Farmer / Panda update (Reform USA)

Names aside, all of these updates (Farmer, Panda, Caffeine, even Google Florida) are similar in many ways but from an SEO perspective it is important to understand that the changes will impact on a number of strategies.

Many websites rely on “tried and true” strategies and continue with them because they have brought positive results in the past.  In particular site owners have a had a penchant for allowing users to add content at will, which in turn helps make the site larger / more content rich and therefore more favourable to Google.

Other sites will automate content and templates to bulk up the site and catch keywords.  Another possibility is that they will see that a certain link strategy (whether ethical or not is not the question here for once) brings them good returns and stick with it.

However the recent changes to at Google suggest that while content may still be king, they are taking a much more qualitative view on the value of content and so webmasters and their SEO advises need to wise up to the changes.

How to counter the losses – 5 key points:

  1. Think long term strategy, not short term fixes
  2. Don’t keep using out-dated strategies
  3. Do your research thoroughly
  4. Constantly innovate in your optimization
  5. Audit your content

Reform has worked with a number of clients around the world developing long term and flexible strategies that maximise the benefit of existing content and infrastructure while providing an ability to move with the times.

Reform can also help you to move forwards with a balanced and ethical SEO approach that is in tune with your strategic goals in other marketing channels including profile building and social media.

Apple or Android? Coca Cola or Fizzy Drink?

I can’t work out if I find flexibility or certainty more comforting. With the fight for democratic freedom raging in North Africa it is easy to feel that freedom of choice aka flexibility is what we really really want. The idea of being straight jacketed in an autocratic regime where there is no choice and you consciously and sub-consciously follow a predetermined path sounds very unappealing to the typical western democrat.

Yet in the most liberal of western societies where consumerism is championed and celebrated we are often quick to disregard the flexibility that our society allows and we opt for ‘choices’ that provide the most certainty. Supermarkets stack their shelves high and wide with a multitude of different products yet when we head up the fizzy drink aisle it is all too easy to grab the slab of Coca-Cola. Do we appreciate the fact that we had the opportunity to choose from 100 alternatives or do we tend to fall back on the ‘certainty’ of the product that we will consume.

The same debate prevails on the supply side. As a manufacturer or service provider should you organise yourself in a ‘walled garden’ (where for example the apps or the plug for your phone chargers only fit your phones) or should you be ‘open source’ (where the U in USB stands for universal)? If you visit a potential supplier’s website to establish the credentials for the service they are offering are you impressed or put off by the number of additional services that they purport to deliver?

The Brand marketer will always go for the closed shop certainty claiming businesses and consumers will always revert to type and if they can make their brand the ‘type’ that people revert to then they have done their job. “Nobody got fired for buying IBM” as they used to say. Scientists and statisticians will recount theories of natural laws that suggest people are intuitively creatures of habit and generally crave some certainty.

But we don’t all drive Ford cars, surf on Dell computers and support Manchester United. Indeed if a farmer planted the same crops in the same field year in year out his yields would collapse. Fields like people can have too much of a good thing. So whether we are looking at human psychology, business models or agricultural best practice it appears that variety may just be the spice of life.

We live in an ever changing world which suggests that we need more than certainty to thrive, but where a good brand is a lazy man’s saviour. Probably no right or wrong answer but something to ponder upon in the shower in the morning.

Blog post by James Kilpatrick, non-executive director at Reform.

Search Engine Marketing in Japan – International Search Review Issue Number 5

Reform published the fifth installment in its “International Search Review” series this week. After venturing all the way to Google friendly India in our previous review, this time we decided to mix things up a bit and check out the land of the rising sun… Japan.

It’s currently the third largest economy in the world but many western businesses find entering into the Japanese marketplace difficult (just ask Facebook). Yet the potential of the Japanese market makes it a worthwhile goal for companies focused on a global presence. With over 94 million people online, Japan also has the third largest population of internet users in the world. This translates into a high amount of paid advertising and PPC ads. In this International Search Review, we break down how the Japanese marketplace can prove difficult for foreign businesses and why it’s worth the effort.

Key stats and findings to take from our review of Japan search market include:

  • This is a market with a broadband penetration of 75%.
  • 90% of all Japanese have a cell phone and 40% of them use their mobile to surf the web.
  • Mobile usage is growing faster than regular internet use.
  • With Google’s partnership with Yahoo! Japan, they now control the organic search results for 84% of the market.
  • Differences in alphabet can create problems in keyword usage.
  • Mixi, not Facebook, dominates the social media marketplace but Twitter has shown that a western brand can be effective.

 

To find out more about the search marketing landscape in Japan, download a copy of the white paper here – and let us know any comments/feedback. Contact us, and we’ll send you the next issue of our International Search Review before anyone else.

Blog post by Matt Dorville, SEO Strategist at Reform