Archive for the ‘Search behaviour’ Category

Re-defining e-commerce sales

What defines an e-commerce sale? This may seem like a question with an easy answer, “sales made online”, right? Not necessarily. A recent article in the Harvard Business Review by Darrell Rigby titled “The Future of Shopping” points out that the influence of e-commerce on sales is not simply about the daily report you receive about yesterday’s on-site sales.

The article asks “is it an e-commerce sale if the customer goes to a store, finds that the product is out of stock, and uses an in-store terminal to have another location ship it to her home? What if the customer is shopping in one store, uses his smartphone to find a lower price at another, and then orders electronically for in-store pickup? How about gifts that are ordered from a website but exchanged at a local store? Experts estimate that digital information already influences about 50% of in-store sales and that number is growing rapidly”.

These scenarios and many others highlight the blurring lines between e-commerce and traditional bricks and mortar shopping, yet this is a topic that many traditional retailers have not begun to understand.

This blurring of the lines creates a host of issues for traditional retailers. How do you market to consumers in the digital age? How do retailers properly track what sources are driving revenue? In terms of marketing to digital age consumers it is apparent that the days of viewing digital channels, in-store marking and traditional advertising in isolation are coming to an end. A focus on creating the easiest and most rewarding shopping experience for the consumer will need to take precedence across retail marketing, creative and advertising agency offices with a focus on coordination of messages.

Marketing efforts will specifically need to increase for mobile and tablet devices as consumers are becoming increasingly savvy at utilising the power of these devices as tools help them shop for the best deals.

The article points out one particularly interesting example of this, citing Tesco’s brand in South Korea called Home plus. In an effort to “bring the store to the consumers at a point in the day when they had time on their hands… Home plus covered the walls of Seoul subway stations with remarkably lifelike backlit images of supermarket shelves containing orange juice fresh vegetables and meat, and hundreds of other items. Consumers wanting to do their food shopping could simply scan each product’s Quick Response code into their smartphones, touch an on-screen button, and thereby assemble a virtual shopping cart. Home plus then delivered the physical goods to the shopper’s home within a few hours”.

In addition to changes in the way retailers market themselves, another aspect of the traditional retail approach must also be addressed. How will various stores, the retailers’ website and marketing channels be credited for sales?  Most retailers still approach sales reporting on a per store basis with the website being counted as one store. As the example above clearly shows this approach is not necessarily relevant in the digital world.

If one store, for example, has a great sales staff but limited stock, it is very possible that consumers could be purchasing online as result of their experience in store. Who gets credit for this? Shouldn’t the great sales staff get some credit? Retailers that think of how to model a reporting system that gives credit where credit is due will likely be ahead of the game in relation to their competitors. They will be in a better position to encourage sales staff to meet all of the consumers’ needs rather than only the needs that can be met within the confines of the walls of the store.

As we can see the definition of an e-commerce sale is changing at a rapid pace and will continue to do so over the coming months and years. Retailers that look ahead and begin to address these changes no are likely to be at big advantage in the years to come.

Blog post by Mike Jennings Director at Reform

Google SSL update and its impact on SEO, SEM and more.

At Reform lively debate and conversation is encouraged as we develop our take on the latest developments in the ever-changing world of digital. Digital marketing is far from black or white (no search-related hat pun intended!), and through these debates we believe that we can better relay our thoughts on both sides of the fence to our clients and colleagues.

This week we’ve been discussing the latest Google SSL update, how Google Analytics now reports some SEO traffic as ‘(not provided)’ and the potential user / privacy issues driving the change.

Here are different takes on this development from two members of our team – one positive, about what Google can do as the innovative leader in this field, the other perhaps more pessimistic about what Google has become.

Niall Madden, Director at Reform says…

The big story here is that when a user logged into Google (Gmail for example) does a search, they are being taken through an encrypted query on Google’s https website, stripping out all the tracking parameters in the process, resulting in that traffic showing in Google Analytics as ‘(not provided)’.

This means that Google, and ONLY Google, know not only what keyword was used, but where the listing ranked in the SERPS (the “cd=” parameter correlates with the SEO rank in all occasions).  Why I hear you ask? Apparently this is due to a concern about protecting the privacy of Google users.

Since the change, if you’re logged in and in the US, you can’t even enter a search query with JavaScript turned off any more (UPDATE – NOV 18 – This is no longer the case, as now we can search with JS off, even when logged in, though some interesting features include one where the sub-links are shrunken into the older link only versions). Combine this with the recent announcement about the algorithm tweak emphasising content freshness (affecting around 35% of results) and there’s a lot of buzz within the SEO industry.

But the big issue is Google Analytics, a free service that’s been great for SEO practitioners over the past few years. Many users started seeing a few SEO visits listed as ‘(not provided)’ in the keyword list, and even a few days ago shrugged it off as overhyped news – since they only saw it affect 1-2% of traffic, people weren’t concerned, life went on.

Then, by last Friday, that 1-2% hit as much as10% on a couple of sites, and people started getting concerned.

There is potentially another layer to this story.

Google recently launched Google Analytics Premier, which it is aggressively pushing to larger scale clients. The introductory price of $150,000 per year provides a service which, according to the brochure will enable you to ‘track more than ever’, ‘own your customer data’ and ‘analyse ALL of your data’.

To me this sounds like music to the ears of clients worried about losing keyword data for 10-20% of SEO traffic to their site, and it has caused many to think that Google might be using this data exclusively like many third party ad providers do theirs.

However, this statement has not been accepted by Google, and their reps and other parties have informed us that this is not currently the case, (so conspiracy theorists can rest, for now). Still, it seems like the logical next step if Google is going to be selling their product, and many people have said that the answers they receive from Google on this subject are vague at best.

Face it, Google has changed. The data is valuable, and they need to generate revenue beyond AdWords. Hey, call me a cynic, but it just seems like the path that Google is taking, regardless of what Google tells me. I mean, really, who’s going to pay $150k when 10-20% of the keyword data is missing!?

And as for user privacy, consumers tend to complain more about targeted advertising, like remarketing perhaps, not SEO results. Ironically for PPC – “If you choose to click on an ad appearing on our search results page, your browser will continue to send the relevant query over the network to enable advertisers to measure the effectiveness of their campaigns and to improve the ads and offers they present to you.”

So where’s that valued privacy now?

Richard Fergie, Consultant at Reform says…

Yes, you are a cynic. As far as I know, it’s all speculation and conspiracy theory at best.

Firstly, I think it is important to be clear that Google *could* do everything that Niall is talking about; there is no technical barrier to them operating an exclusive web analytics service in this way. My argument is not that Google can’t, but that Google won’t.

What will Google gain from this? If this change increases uptake of their premium analytics product so that it grows to twice the size of Omniture it will increase Google’s revenues by only 2% (based on 2010 figures).

Not the type of return shareholders are looking for.

2% at Google’s scale is still a lot of money but I think this reward is not worth the anti-trust risk for Google. Google are already walking a fine line in the anti-trust courts; I say that using their dominance in search to help them dominate the premium web analytics space will put them so far on the wrong side of the line that the US Government will have to take action.

So what is the real reason why Google have made this change? I genuinely believe that they are doing it to protect user data. Not because they care about user privacy but because user data is being used to compete with Google in the online advertising space.

Google Remarketing is an excellent retargeting solution but it is nowhere near being the best in the space. Giving these ad networks additional data in the form of the user’s search query makes their targeting even more efficient and harder to compete with. Google can reduce the effectiveness of their competition and gain brownie points with organisations who care about user privacy – win/win.

So who is right?

Only time will tell (though at this moment Google have claimed that the data will currently NOT be added to Google Analytics Premium). In the mean time, this surely provides an opportunity for innovation and development within the SEO industry.

Every business in every industry suffers setbacks at some point, and from an SEO practitioner point of view, this certainly feels like a step backwards for SEOs that analyse keyword data as a key sign of the overall project’s value.

However, workarounds will be developed, new KPIs will emerge, and the industry will continue to grow. This isn’t the first time data has been closed off, and presumably it won’t be the last.

Blog post by Niall Madden, SEO Director of Reform

To App Or Not To App? The rise and rise of mobile

Where is your mobile right now? Are you using it to read this blog? Are you looking at an app? Are you browsing a web page? Are you on a call? Are you texting? Is it on the table next to you?  Has your five year old got their hands on it? When did you last let your mobile out of your site for more than two minutes? How many of us take our mobiles to the bathroom with us? How many of us will actually happily let another person use our mobile and not check it upon its return? Wherever your mobile is right now it can’t be denied that we have become entirely dependent upon the device. And yet brand and businesses have yet to capitalise on this.

Is it safe to say mobile apps are currently the way to go or should businesses and brands spend extra building an efficient optimized mobile site? Are we going to see mobile web take over apps down the line? Probably, yes, however apps seem to be where the hearts of the purse holders are right now.

So what do the numbers look like? Nielsen published data showing that 36% of US mobile consumers have smartphones, and ComScore research shows that the average mobile in the US has 34 apps with an average of only four used daily. App downloaders with Apple iOS and Android OS smartphones have more applications on their mobile phones than those with other kinds of smartphones, with an average of 48 apps on iPhones and 35 apps on Android phones.

There are positives for both apps and mobile websites. The latter offer a wider customer reach as they aren’t as phone model specific, and the barriers to use are lower as customers aren’t required to download anything. A mobile-optimised site also often allows more search functionality and more scope for being unrestrained in terms of design. It is also arguably easier to make relevant changes and updates whenever you like on a mobile website.

The advantages of having an app are bedded in the fact that the iPhone and smartphones are dominating the mobile internet space currently. An app is more appealing to iPhone and smartphone owners, and with the location based services available these apps provide fantastic visibility for the brand. Apps can redefine usability and interaction on mobile phones; act as a container for traditional content such as videos or games; provide an economical avenue for additional marketing exposure; and be a direct connection to festival goers (for example), keeping them informed and up-to-date with schedules, announcements, and alerts.

With the mobile industry heading towards mobile web and with generic top level domains (GTLDs) fast approaching surely it is going to change the way we discover and experience brands via our mobile.  The app v mobile website argument will continue to rumble on. What’s important is to look closely at your customers before making any decisions. Which is more appealing to them? At Reform we can advise your business on which option is the best for you. We don’t just tell you to build one but prove to you with research which is best for your business or brand.

Blog post by Anthony Dobson, Business Development Executive at Reform

Real time serendipity and a frictionless Facebook experience

Mark Zuckerberg used the words ‘real time serendipity’ and ‘frictionless engagement’ throughout the F8 conference last month.  A rough translation reads, ‘more engagement and less spam’.

Much of the conference focused on the new “this is your life” time-lines and the new class of open graph apps, which no longer require authorisation for every story published.

Facebook wants us to think of our interactions with apps as ‘self expression’, reading, listening, watching and importantly making serendipitous discoveries about our friends, their interests and activities.  ‘Graph Rank’ has been introduced to keep app developers in check.  It is an artificial intelligence that manages discovery based on feedback to cut out spam.

Have the recent changes to Facebook impacted strategies for building fans and optimising fan page engagement?

The abiding principles of managing a successful Facebook page remain the same. It’s vital that page managers have a thorough understanding of Facebook’s EdgeRank algorithm when planning strategies. Publishing timely, relevant updates tailored to the fan base and target audience, with the goal of optimising engagement and as a result, increasing reach.

The introduction of the hybrid news feed, featuring ‘top stories’ above ‘recent stories’, reinforces the value of knowing as much as possible about what makes your existing fans and your target market ‘tick’.

The ticker, a sidebar news stream where every story created now passes through in real-time is designed to create this ‘frictionless’ experience. The idea is to keep stories that are lightweight away from the main news stream so we never feel annoyed by a friend’s online activity. No more having to hide friends due to their obsession with Cityville.

As data comes in it will be interesting to see how this shift in lightweight stories over to the ticker impacts secondary reach for page posts.

Have you had any ‘serendipitous discoveries’ through the ticker yet or did you minimise it as soon as you found out how!?

The only change rolled out so far for Facebook pages, since this year’s F8, are improved page insights.  Facebook has made it easier for a fan page to measure how well they are faring against the competition as well as giving page owners a better understanding of ROI by introducing a few new juicy metrics.

We are now able to measure each post to a Facebook page in terms of reach (unique impressions), engaged users (Clicks), talking about this (stories) and virality (previously feedback).  The reach metric is also broken down to show organic, paid and viral reach.  We can now begin to measure the impact that sponsored stories have on viral reach and organic reach. Great news if you are managing a Facebook ad budget!

I’m particularly excited about the ‘people talking about this’ figure.   Every story or interaction created about a page, including Page likes, likes, comments, event RSVP and answers to polls are transformed into one account-able figure. This figure is not only available to track in insights but displayed publicly on your page.

Simply divide fans by ‘people talking about this’ and you get a figure you can use to measure the engagement of your page over time or the engagement of one page against another.

This public display of engagement is an excellent method to quickly monitor the health of a page and more importantly the brand that owns the page.

Guest blogger Hilary Pullen, Freelance Digital Marketing and Blogger

Gamification strategies are now a key part of UX and customer engagement – ignore this and your brand will suffer

Social media is a game. Some people (like me) don’t get that at first. Or maybe in the early days social platforms relied very much on early adopters who were happy just making friends (and maybe making out with them) via social. In the last twelve months however, engagement, challenges, rewards badges you can virtually gift etc, have tuned me into the fun. I find myself immersed in a world of fans, followers, circles, news feeds and apps, and all that alongside my Klout perks, beta test invitations and the micro affiliate cash I can get for simply recommending a product or service to my followers. The power that rewards can leverage to an online brand strategy is awesome. See the overnight success of Badgeville, and the adoption of behaviour analytics as a basket of key metrics in the measurement of a brand’s power to engage customer loyalty meaningfully.

Simply organising your social media life, identifying and connecting with the people that matter to you emotionally brings immeasurable pleasure. As does listening and advocating those that you find thought-provoking and that you can learn stuff from, dipping into the musings of others you know it’s good to keep tabs on, and finding those people you perhaps knew long time ago when you had a different set of priorities that now keep you connected to a shared past. This emotional payback through connectivity is an intrinsic motivational driver to the key engagement piece, and is why I argue that, although I can see a world when Facebook is the suburbs with new and innovative social urban conurbations emerging, social experience utilising technologies is here to stay.

Games for Brands, a conference on gamification, is being held in London on the 27th of October and will be the first mover in what is set to become the new social media. A quick skim read of the list of keynote speakers sees representatives of the UK’s major broadcasters, agencies, and games developer communities, as well as the academics and social entrepreneurs. Harnessing the power of gamification and utilising it is going to be exciting and will be another step-changing crossroads in the incredible journey that digital is affording the marcomms sector. Bring it on!

If you would like to discuss your social strategy and the implications and opportunities that gamification represents, please contact Reform.

Blog post by Mary Keane-Dawson, non-executive director at Reform.

From riots to dinosaurs – how digital continues to amaze me

I am a student from Birmingham City University, working at Reform on my placement year. A couple of months into my digital year in industry there are few things that have struck me…

When I tell people I am working in digital for my placement year, a common reaction is to imagine a fantasy world, impregnable, with very techy people playing around with code on computers.  I don’t think that could be further from the truth at this moment in time. Digital is becoming more and more crucial to daily life and I for one welcome this.

Social media was recently blamed by many for enabling the London riots. However, I think the key point to remember is that it’s not social media itself that is the problem, its how people use it. For all the Blackberry messenger organised rioting, there were also some fantastic campaigns on Twitter and Facebook which help to restore faith in humanity, focusing on communities cleaning up and coming together.

This is the kind of reassurance that digital can provide, and it even extends to nations. During the earthquakes in Japan, Twitter, Facebook and Skype all helped families to reconnect and confirm the safety of loved ones. Analogue phone lines could not cope with the extreme high levels of people trying to contact each other, but digital platforms enabled contact and granted peace of mind in times of immense trauma.

And what about the power of social media to spread fantastic stories that would not be heard otherwise? The best example in the last few days is the story about one man’s experience with Marks and Spencer’s customer service. In case you haven’t already seen it, one customer who was overcharged for a sandwich was told in response to his complaint that he would receive a gift card in compensation. When he didn’t receive his gift card he asked politely for a hand-drawn picture of a smiley dinosaur to be included with the gift card (presumably as a joke?!). Wonderfully he actually got what he asked for, including a message apologising ‘unfortunately art was never my strong point…’ Check out the picture of the dinosaur – it’s actually quite good!

Digital is connecting more and more with the real world and we get to hear about real people and their experiences so much more than we ever could previously. What I love about the digital industry is that it’s volatile, it’s unpredictable, it’s challenging and it’s here to stay. Another plus is that apparently I’m a computer genius now that I work in digital. (It is worth bearing in mind that this is coming from my mother who is amazed because I know Ctrl+C…).

By Karen Hawey at Reform

The new domain name game

Starting in January 2012, companies will have the opportunity to register new tailored domain names. Traditional naming conventions such as .com and .net will continue to exist, but brands will be able to use other words or phrases, such as their own brand name, as their domain name. For example, Reform.com could use reform.reform and other variations thereof using the .reform structure.

What will the cost for this new domain structure be? There’s an application fee which costs around £180,000, plus an annual running cost around £25,000. So, for many businesses, this kind of investment will prove cost prohibitive.

At Reform we’ll be monitoring what effect, if any, these new naming conventions have on search optimisation best practices. Will Google and other search engines favour one domain name over the other, and if so, could it lead to an unfair advantage in preserving top rankings? This will be an interesting space that we’ll be keeping an eye on for our clients.

Additionally, the new domain naming convention .xxx has been approved by ICANN after eleven years. Although some countries, such as India, have already started banning the new naming convention, brands and individuals now have less than a fifty day window to register to ensure their assets are not used in the adult online industry.

While the benefits of the .xxx domain include heightened parental control, as well as the hope that people will be less likely to unwittingly stumble across adult content, the 15,000 domain names that have been reserved are almost certainly not enough to protect all the people that may be affected. What about everyone else’s reputations?

ICM Registry’s chief executive Stuart Lawley said, “Regardless of what your personal views are on the existence of pornography on the internet, at least .xxx will give people the information they need to make a choice.”

Reform provides a bespoke brand monitoring service that can help you to ensure your brand is not misrepresented. With these new developments, it is more important than ever to invest in the right amount of diligence to protect your brand. Get in touch if you would like to know more.

Blog post by Anthony Dobson, Business Development Executive at Reform

Search engine marketing in Malaysia – International search review issue number 7

Reform has this week published the latest paper in its international search review series. Continuing the focus on markets in Southeast Asia, this instalment looks at the internet and search market of Malaysia.

With internet penetration increasing from 15% in 2000 to 59% in 2009, it’s clear that there has been significant change in this country’s technological outlook over the last decade.

This is another market where Google has consolidated its dominance of the search engine arena, growing its share from 51% in 2008 to 85% in 2011.

The increase in internet penetration (16,902,600 internet users as of June 2009) has occurred in spite of the fact that the quality of the broadband in Malaysia is still rated as ‘poor’. This, combined with a growing number of increasingly sophisticated mobile devices, has led analysts to believe that mobile search will become ever more important in this market.

Advances in mobile technologies can also be looked to as the facilitators for the phenomenal popularity of social media sites in Malaysia. This is a country that has Facebook penetration of 88.4%, and which accounts for .47% of Twitter’s world voice.

Since 2009 the number of Malaysian web users using social media to keep in touch with family has increased to 71%.

To find out more about the search market landscape in Malaysia, download a copy of the review – and let us know any comments or feedback that you might have. You can also download past issues of the International Search Review to see what we discovered about Chinese internet development and the Russian search behaviour evolution amongst other things.

Contact us and we’ll send you the next issue of our International Search Review before anyone else.

Blog post by Juliette van Rooyen, Consultant at Reform.

What are we excited about for 2011?

Now that the holidays are quickly becoming a distant memory we wanted to take a look back at changes in TV, mobile and social media in 2010 and consider what exciting changes are in store for 2011.

In May Google announced that it had partnered with Sony and Logitech to bring a new product to our television screens. Called Google TV the idea is to allow “users access [to] all of their usual TV channels as well as a world of internet and cloud-based information and applications… all from the comfort of their own living room and with the same simplicity as browsing the web.”¹ Initially hailed as a major innovation in how we will interact with our TVs, Google TV has so far struggled to secure access to content from major US TV Networks and has received less than positive response to the initial software offering.  Despite these setbacks the ability for consumers to access web content via their TV will become a reality in the near future and could offer advertisers a unique opportunity to gain access to TV consumers in a new, distinctive and more trackable way in 2011.

Social media has also grown in influence amongst advertisers in 2010.  Although many major brands have had a presence on Facebook and You Tube for some time, the past year has seen a shift in how these sites are used by brands to interact with its consumers.  FMCG & retail brands in particular have begun to drive advertising toward their Facebook pages as a means of increasing the number of likes.  These pages can then be used to offer exclusive offers to customers that have already showed an active interest in the product. As we head into 2011 it is likely that advertisers will continue to embrace social media as a means of both reaching out to current customers as well as connecting with future shoppers not only via Facebook pages but also through advertising directly on Facebook via Ad Serving Units, the utilisation of in-application advertising and beyond.

It is often said that it is the first and last thing you interact with during your day but the mobile has come a long way since the days of simple calls and texts. Over the past year advertisers have begun to embrace the mobile by increasing their focus on building applications and mobile friendly websites for their customers.  Although this is a good start, the consumer is likely to demand that their smart phone enable them to do most, if not all, of the things their PC does in the near future.  With an estimated  $1.5 billion in sales worldwide made via the mobile on eBay alone in 2010 it is clear that businesses will not only need to have the capability to handle mobile e-commerce but also to ensure that their mobile advertising, including mobile search & display are a priority in 2011. ²

With so much innovation in the industry and so many new channels for advertisers to test and explore, 2011 is sure to be another busy year. Keeping up with changes in TV, mobile, & social media will be crutial to ensure continued customer retention & business growth.

1)    http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/20100520_googletv.html
2)    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/01/ebay-shows-where-mobile-shopping-is-hot/

Blog post by Mike Jennings, Director at Reform

Search analytics helps us to know our customers that little bit better

Most businesses are interested in who their customers are and curious about where they come from. However brilliant their product or service, there remains a wonderful undercurrent of insecurity. Why are people buying what I sell?

Traditionally this insecurity has been addressed by market research firms. Research is then passed to business analysts, who review these surveys and other data. These techniques have value, but also fall down in a couple of key areas. Firstly – it may seem obvious – but market researchers can only work with the responses they receive. This may not represent a realistic client base, leaving them to extrapolate results to draw conclusions.

For potential customers, research and internal data is going to be even less representative. A holiday letting business may know that many of its customers come from a cluster of postcodes but does not know where potential customers from the same postcodes go on holiday or why. It would have an even poorer view of the holiday aspirations of people outside of the postcodes where most of its business originates.

With the shift to ecommerce the situation has improved, as more customer data is captured by businesses generally. Online surveys help too, as they mean a business can get a better grasp of customer motivation. But sadly this still does not solve the riddle of the non customer. Well, not unless you step into the world of Search.

Searching with a small ‘s’ has been a fundamental human characteristic since time immemorial. The advent of search engines, however, has dramatically broadened our ability to find even the most esoteric products, services or solutions to our problems. But if you look at search engines from a different perspective, they become a business analytics nirvana.

In the right hands and with the right technology a company can now answer questions like: “What search terms led this customer to buy my service?” They can even see how many people were searching for the same thing – giving their market share for that particular search – and how available their service was compared to competitors, by using systems like AdIntel to measure share of voice.

There is virtually no limit to the quantitative data that is available through effective search analytics. What makes this all the more interesting is a more recent ability to overlay qualitative analysis on the results. Historically a buyer was good, and someone who did not buy was bad. But now we can analyse things like the lifetime value of a client to improve our understanding. And by ‘listening’ to social media traffic, (and other user generated content), positive and negative attitudes can be interwoven with quantitative data that tracks the movement of consumers around the net.

Given that the internet both sells directly and informs consumers for offline purchases, the opportunities for satisfying the curiosity of businesses grow larger every day. Not only can we tell you where your customer came from and why, but we can also suggest why they did not go to your competitor. Tidy?

Blog post by James Kilpatrick, non-Executive Director of Reform