We all packed our bags and hit the bright lights of New York. Actually, no, not really….. We have someone here in our New York office, and we sent him out to SMX 2009 at the Javits Center last week.
There were many things to be seen at SMX East. Perhaps more so than in the London equivalent. Here is what we saw plenty of. . .
Out of the booths, or tables, stands, whatever you want to call them, it felt like HALF of them were about tracking solutions of either website traffic stats, or how to track, analyse, or manage Google / Yahoo / Bing PPC campaigns in one place, with an interface that’s user-friendly and generates the “right” customised reports.
The good side was that some of them had effective ways of separating what the user actually queried versus the ad campaigns keyword bid, and displayed useful figures such as your keywords “impression share” – which could help refine campaigns and increase returns further. However, most of these applications made the same mistake – they were programmed in Dollars and Cents. So no Pounds and Pence, and no Euros, makes it a lot harder for the more international sites to use at this point.
So I’d say one of the biggest disappointments was the lack of international influence. Almost everything was very US market focused, with maybe versions coming out later for the UK market (once we asked). Which is a shame, as some of them looked very promising, quite competitively priced, and ran quite smoothly. Of course, things always look nicer in the showroom!
And going to the other end of the spectrum, “local search” was almost silent. There was some buzz and several conferences about optimising via the Web 2.0 tools, a la Twitter, YouTube, etc. But most of the buzz was around tracking and general SEO.
There were a fair few “SEO Interfaces” – as perhaps more companies are looking for a more template approach to SEO. Yet, it’s the “same old” in most cases. Your Yahoo site explorer links, your Google PR, your Alexa page rank, and various other things you can find online and aren’t even the most reliable sources in some instances. Then there are others that just over-analyse rankings and keyword density to the point where clients get obsessed with both! And that’s not how SEO works in the first place.
Too many places trying to define it a certain way, and maybe that’s influenced by client marketing teams and needs. If there was a template mechanism for measuring SEO accurately, it would be a hit for sure. However, reality is, you cannot template SEO. Every tool I’ve seen has promise, but then if you try it with three sites that you either own or have access to the data of – it will usually be way off with at least one of the three. And that’s a horrendous rate for any marketing tool. That’s why we give every website a customised approach.
As for my attendance, I was there on day two (Tuesday), as it was more SEO geared and had a “link building” conference. However, for those that actively deal with link building, there was nothing new here. The usual “does Google detect link buying” (only meters away from companies that buy/sell links for search marketing purposes!) – and the usual complaints from sites that are making quite basic mistakes. As for link buying, it has at least becoming more internationally focused itself. By that we mean, for the sites that want to dabble in buying links, link brokers now have a more international reach. Since Google’s algorithm has a lot to do with link strength and location, it’s always a touchy subject. Here at Reform, we make sure all sites know what they’re getting involved in before even considering such routes, and what the pros and cons are.
More details from SMX East 2009 can be seen at http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/020841.html
(which has live blog transcripts of every other session at SMX east too).