Posts Tagged ‘Retail’

Re-defining e-commerce sales

What defines an e-commerce sale? This may seem like a question with an easy answer, “sales made online”, right? Not necessarily. A recent article in the Harvard Business Review by Darrell Rigby titled “The Future of Shopping” points out that the influence of e-commerce on sales is not simply about the daily report you receive about yesterday’s on-site sales.

The article asks “is it an e-commerce sale if the customer goes to a store, finds that the product is out of stock, and uses an in-store terminal to have another location ship it to her home? What if the customer is shopping in one store, uses his smartphone to find a lower price at another, and then orders electronically for in-store pickup? How about gifts that are ordered from a website but exchanged at a local store? Experts estimate that digital information already influences about 50% of in-store sales and that number is growing rapidly”.

These scenarios and many others highlight the blurring lines between e-commerce and traditional bricks and mortar shopping, yet this is a topic that many traditional retailers have not begun to understand.

This blurring of the lines creates a host of issues for traditional retailers. How do you market to consumers in the digital age? How do retailers properly track what sources are driving revenue? In terms of marketing to digital age consumers it is apparent that the days of viewing digital channels, in-store marking and traditional advertising in isolation are coming to an end. A focus on creating the easiest and most rewarding shopping experience for the consumer will need to take precedence across retail marketing, creative and advertising agency offices with a focus on coordination of messages.

Marketing efforts will specifically need to increase for mobile and tablet devices as consumers are becoming increasingly savvy at utilising the power of these devices as tools help them shop for the best deals.

The article points out one particularly interesting example of this, citing Tesco’s brand in South Korea called Home plus. In an effort to “bring the store to the consumers at a point in the day when they had time on their hands… Home plus covered the walls of Seoul subway stations with remarkably lifelike backlit images of supermarket shelves containing orange juice fresh vegetables and meat, and hundreds of other items. Consumers wanting to do their food shopping could simply scan each product’s Quick Response code into their smartphones, touch an on-screen button, and thereby assemble a virtual shopping cart. Home plus then delivered the physical goods to the shopper’s home within a few hours”.

In addition to changes in the way retailers market themselves, another aspect of the traditional retail approach must also be addressed. How will various stores, the retailers’ website and marketing channels be credited for sales?  Most retailers still approach sales reporting on a per store basis with the website being counted as one store. As the example above clearly shows this approach is not necessarily relevant in the digital world.

If one store, for example, has a great sales staff but limited stock, it is very possible that consumers could be purchasing online as result of their experience in store. Who gets credit for this? Shouldn’t the great sales staff get some credit? Retailers that think of how to model a reporting system that gives credit where credit is due will likely be ahead of the game in relation to their competitors. They will be in a better position to encourage sales staff to meet all of the consumers’ needs rather than only the needs that can be met within the confines of the walls of the store.

As we can see the definition of an e-commerce sale is changing at a rapid pace and will continue to do so over the coming months and years. Retailers that look ahead and begin to address these changes no are likely to be at big advantage in the years to come.

Blog post by Mike Jennings Director at Reform

Benefits of on-site search

On-site search. It’s a feature found on almost every e-commerce website, and yet for years retailers have largely completely ignored its benefits.

Traditionally returning irrelevant results, for most e-commerce departments this function has not been a priority. Instead they have focused on actions such as SEO and web page conversion optimisation. Recent data, however, suggests that this is likely to change over the coming months.

NMA recently published an article to this effect, saying that “research shows that at least 50% of visitors want to use the search function”. “Last October, FACT – Finder conducted research using eye-tracker technology to take a closer look at on-site user behaviour, and 80% of the British people surveyed went as far as saying search boxes should be more prominent on the page”. With such a large percentage of people actively seeking an on-site search box, improving this feature is bound to move up the priority list for e-commerce managers.

Getting the placement of the on-site search functionality right, and making sure that it returns relevant results, will certainty help to improve on-site conversion. However, there is another aspect of this feature that should also be looked at.

In most cases data on what is being searched for is readily available via a sites CMS. Analysing and using this data properly is another way for e-commerce teams to improve on-site conversion. Looking at what keywords are currently being searched for can not only help websites to better place their products on site, but can also help to inform what is being looked for by the consumer. If there are a high number of searches for a certain type of product but the sales are generally quite low, then there should be an immediate red flag that something is not working. Is there enough stock for this product? Is the style, colour and sizing all that it could be? Analysing this can help improve the site owner’s placement of products as well as help to inform future stock orders.

So, with demand for a quality search function growing, and with the clear benefits that can be gained from analysing the data this feature produces, surely this will become a priority for all ecommerce websites?

Blog post by Mike Jennings Director at Reform

How businesses should (or shouldn’t) react to Google’s latest update

SEO has come a long way in the past decade, with companies focusing on search as a key component of their digital marketing strategy. And while you can probably guess I would be in the position to say such a thing, the truth is that SEO can indeed make or break a business on the web, leveling the playing field in this day and age between big names and local startups.

Companies around the world have started to use a good portion of their overall marketing resource based on how they perform in search. This is great, but it seems to me as still less of a “plan to action”, and more of a “knee jerk reaction”. The recent Google Panda / Farmer update was a major example of this – with companies “reacting” left and right wondering what they did wrong. While we love the fact that in today’s marketplace, many businesses are watching their search engine marketing performance much more closely – unfortunately, many are also believing everything they hear! So yes, SEO has indeed come a long way – and companies won’t fall for just anything, but there are certainly are still a fair bit of misconceptions going around the industry.

One recent example was the Overstock.com SEO Spam incident that you may have heard about on both the major news sites like CNN, or industry sites such as Search Engine Land where the major US retailer was penalised in the Google algorithm – supposedly (but this reason was never fully confirmed) for having a link building strategy that consisted of bulk .edu links. Weeks later, Overstock itself issued a statement saying that they had made the fixes Google required and sure enough they were back in the index – and all was well.

Some people simply assumed that Overstock had simply fixed things up, while some people complained that it was unfair that the big companies get such an advantage and got reinstated (not bothering to check why), while most companies only remembered the first part of the Overstock story, spending the time since chasing their SEO team, consultant or agency about some other new story that made the rounds in the industry or mainstream press. Perhaps direct competitors did look a bit closer at the overall situation, but we cannot confirm this, and thats not the issue here anyway.

Either way, it seemed like no one from any of the groups above double checked the story. If Google says no to bulk link acquisition and Overstock got banned from Google, does that mean Overstock’s bulk link acquisition got them in trouble? No. It was a poor misconception, an assumption that A+B=C. Clients should expect more from an agency, consultant or in house team, especially when monitoring competitor activity. We in this industry should be looking at the full answer and not taking other people’s word all the time. The EDU links by the way are still quite active in many places (example: http://www.alumni.ncsu.edu/s/1209/index.aspx?sid=1209&gid=1&pgid=632) – and so what changed then? Well, on the pages that got penalised for generic terms such as “living room furniture” – Overstock.com had pop-up/expandable text coded within the tags of their page. The pop-up text was filled with keywords and was in Google’s cache and visible to text browsers (screenshot of this example below).

The text strategy was reported by a competitor and got penalised shortly after. Yet, when Overstock was allowed back in, what changed? The links stayed, yet the hidden text is no longer there. Could this have been the “real” reason why the penalty was imposed in the first place?

No one will know for sure, but the point is that many companies will go by what they hear/read and that there are still many misconceptions about SEO as a whole. Here at Reform we make sure we try to not just throw some excuse about why sites perform the way that they do, but examine closer into it and find out what the real reason may be – instead of a “one size fits all” answer. With this extra insight and custom approach to your overall digital marketing strategy, SEO can become more of a natural approach, rather than a mystery. Not necessarily the wrong answer or right answer, but exploring multiple answers and possibilities and avoiding any potential misconceptions is key to any project we take on.

Adding value to online retail: the in-store shopping experience

With time to kill in between appointments last week I found myself in Top Shop’s flagship store on Oxford Street in London. Not for the first time I was struck by how different the shopping experience is. Indeed Top Shop is less of a shop nowadays, more like a nightclub-cum-youth club-cum-beauty salon. With TVs and music blaring, girls of all ages (thirteen up to forty!) were browsing, chatting, phoning, texting. Oh and there was some purchasing going on too. Top Shop is a real-life social media experience.

Back in the virtual world, in December 2009 £5.46 billion was spent online in the UK, a 17% increase y-o-y. According to the IMRG Capgemini e-Retail Sales Index, the Clothing sector saw an 18% annual increase in online spend and Accessories in particular saw a phenomenal 101% annual increase. Driven by a quest for shopping on demand, online retail, or e-tail, is certainly thriving.

The challenge for both online and bricks and mortar retailers is that the Millennial generation – defined as the mid-teens to late twenties who have grown up in a digital world – are a fickle bunch. They want social interaction but they also want a highly personal experience. They expect you (the retail brand) to know exactly what they want, and they want to have it now. They have been spoilt by the instant gratification of Google, and the infinite choice of niche sellers that the Web has to offer. It’s all about me, or “me-tail”, after all.

Customer acquisition and retention strategies must therefore be cross-media and highly targeted. Indeed, in its Industry Report entitled ‘The “me-tail” revolution’, Accenture urges retailers to radically reinvent themselves, and cite the example of Domino’s Pizza’s use of Facebook and mobile phone apps – as well as TV – to facilitate orders, and Best Buy’s leveraging of Twitter to answer customer queries.  According to Accenture, it won’t be long before this new generation of always-on customers spurns the concept of retail grazing.

Whereas for the last ten years, retailers have been trying to work out how their websites might add value to in-store spending, the tables are now turning. What is clear from the Top Shop experience is that the physical store space must now add value to the price-led, convenience and personalisation of shopping online.

This blog post was written by Amanda Davie, Managing Director, Reform.